alt.culture.zippies ~ Are zippies an invention of WIRED?
"We are no longer in the drama of alienation... ...we are in the ecstasy of communication." ~Jean Baudrillard
Newsgroups: alt.culture.zippies
From: laura@soda.berkeley.edu (Laura La Gassa)
Subject: Re: Are zippies an invention of WIRED?
Date: 6 Jul 1994 18:07:12 GMT
Organization: Computer Science Undergraduate Association, UC Berkeley
Lines: 32
In article <2veks6$10s@panix3.panix.com>,
C.P.Townsend wrote:
>Just a thought.
>
>I ain't no zippy.
No, although it sure does seem like it. Wired contributor Jules
Marshall lives in Europe and heard about these people and met
up with their leader . . . Marshall then wrote a big story on it
that ended up on the cover of Wired.
I truly believe, though, that the Zippies would never have gotten any of
the attention they have now if not for the Wired cover article and
the flurry of informaiton and mis-information that followed.
I find the whole thing to be annoying: ravers have been on the
net for over two years now, and online communities have been existing
for as long as the net has. I really don't see what's so new or cool about
these Zippy people -- the US net/rave/techno/computer/student/hacker
community has been doing this so-called Zippy stuff for a while -- we just
didn't get a Wired cover for it. There's a whole web of artists, DJs,
musicians, party organizers, computer professionals, pagan spiritualists,
students, writers, and what have you who are all joined together and
communicate daily. We've built muds, moos, and chat sites. We have
mailing lists, archives, and web sites. The community includes members
from Japan, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and North America. So as far čas
"embracing technology" we've got that down, too. And the rhetoric isn't much
different at all from the standard idealistic rave-community rhetoric.
So what's the big deal here?
Laura
Newsgroups: alt.culture.zippies
From: arandia@panix.com (Joel Arandia)
Subject: Re: Are zippies an invention of WIRED?
Date: 7 Jul 1994 19:08:29 -0400
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and Unix, NYC
Lines: 30
In <2versg$i5l@agate.berkeley.edu> la ura@soda.berkeley.edu (Laura La Gassa) writes:
>I find the whole thing to be annoying: ravers have been on the
>net for over two years now, and online communities have been existing
>for as long as the net has. I really don't see what's so new or cool about
>these Zippy people -- the US net/rave/techno/computer/student/hacker
>community has been doing this so-called Zippy stuff for a while -- we just
>didn't get a Wired cover for it. There's a whole web of artists, DJs,
>musicians, party organizers, computer professionals, pagan spiritualists,
>students, writers, and what have you who are all joined together and
>communicate daily. We've built muds, moos, and chat sites. We have
>mailing lists, archives, and web sites. The community includes members
>from Japan, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and North America. So as far as
>"embracing technology" we've got that down, too. And the rhetoric isn't much
>different at all from the standard idealistic rave-community rhetoric.
>So w hat's the big deal here?
Big misunderstanding here. The Zippies know that there is a
huge rave network out there. That is what they depend on. They want
get a message out there. The ravers are young. The ravers are well
connected. What better way is there to propogate a meme but through
existing channels?
What rave has is a large group of well connected young people.
What would happen if all these people, these ravers, stood up and
shouted against American governmental bullshit? Ravers could
potentially be the most effective and organized social force in
the world. Potentially.
joel
Newsgroups: alt.culture.zippies
From: ggoff@rain.org (Greg Goff)
Subject: Re: Are zippies an invention of WIRED?
Date: 7 Jul 1994 19:47:56 -0700
Organization: Regional Access Information Network (RAIN)
Lines: 58
Joel Arandia (arandia@panix.com) had this to say:
> In <2versg$i5l@agate.berkeley.edu> laura@soda.berkeley.edu (Laura La Gassa) writes:
> >I find the whole thing to be annoying: ravers have been on the
> >net for over two years now, and online communities have been existing
> >for as long as the net has. I really don't see what's so new or cool about
> >these Zippy people -- the US net/rave/techno/computer/student/hacker
> >community has been doing this so-called Zippy stuff for a while -- we just
> >didn't get a Wired cover for it. There's a čwhole web of artists, DJs,
> >musicians, party organizers, computer professionals, pagan spiritualists,
> >students, writers, and what have you who are all joined together and
> >communicate daily. We've built muds, moos, and chat sites. We have
> >mailing lists, archives, and web sites. The community includes members
> >from Japan, Europe, Australia, Brazil, and North America. So as far as
> >"embracing technology" we've got that down, too. And the rhetoric isn't much
> >different at all from the standard idealistic rave-community rhetoric.
> >So what's the big deal here?
> Big misunderstanding here. The Zippies know that there is a
> huge rave network out there. That is what they depend on. They want
> get a message out there. The ravers are young. The ravers are well
> connected. What better way is there to propogate a meme but through
> existing channels?
> What rave has is a large group of well connected young people.
> What would happen if all these people, these ravers, stood up and
> shouted against American governmental bullshit? Ravers could
> potentially be the most effective and organized social force in
> the world. Potentially.
> joel
Bonus point: the zippies have the potential to bring in a whole bunch of
people from OUTSIDE the rave culture, as well. I'm not a raver. I'm not
really a hippy (extrordinary hair-length not-withstanding), either. I may
not even be a zippie (Cf. thread: 'are we REALLY zippies?'). But when I
picked up the Wired article and read: revolution involving synthesis of
eco/human values and appropriate technology about to sweep the planet,
they got me. I think that the zippies have the potential to link
together bunches of far-flung isolated networks (communities) into a single
*inter*network of people with common sentiments.
I don't want to compete with the ravers. Nor do I want to see the rave
movement subsumed into the zippie (or some other) movement. I think that
we can all retain our resp čective sub-cultural identities, and still form
a whole that is greater than the sum of the parts.
If the zippies have some other agenda, then, IMO, the people who read
this group are probably not zippies. I know that I couldn't align my
energies with such a movement.